Yesterday marked over two months since the surgery. I've come a long way, but there's a long way to go too. I'm now allowed to bike and elliptical on my own, so I took advantage of that today and went to the school rec center: 15 minutes on the bike, and ten on the elliptical. This I did in addition to my usual morning weight routine which takes nearly 45 minutes. It would be great to bike outside, especially since the weather is nice today, but I don't think I'm ready for that and won't be for awhile. My leg still shakes with weakness after 15 minutes. Also, it seems that my good knee has been hurting and popping some, which must be some kind of compensation problem. I'm hoping it's nothing serious and just a mild consequence of putting most of my weight on the good knee, since the pain started when I was on the crutches.
Last night one of my old teammates who goes to dental school in Richmond came down to see the team massage therapist. I dropped by while he was there since I hadn't seen him since the summer. The massage guy, who punished and tortured me for so many years, had an interesting comment about leg strength that I hadn't heard before: your quads should be 20 percent stronger than your hamstrings. That is, if you are on a leg press that works your quads, you should use 100 pounds if you are using 80 pounds on a leg curl machine for your hamstrings. No wonder runners have so much trouble with knees: quads get very little action compared to hamstrings and calves. Biking can change that, though.
My teammate's got knee issues like I do and has been out ever since dominating the Boston marathon last spring. He really hasn't been able to run since then and an MRI indicated grade 1 or 2 damage to the articular cartilage. That's where the cartilage is bruised or has a small divot in it, but not like my grade 4 where it's chipped out all the way to the bone. He seems so motivated to run again and get back into regular training, but with permanent damage like that, it may not be possible. Since his damage wasn't as severe as mine, the docs say surgery wouldn't accomplish anything, which leaves him out in the cold if the pain persists. Hopefully most of the pain is caused by some inflammation from whatever he did and once that subsides he'll be able to run again, but if I were him I would change my mindset. Right now, I would consider my recovery a success if I am able to run 20 -30 miles a week. It's so bad because he was running so well and even got some sponsorship offers. Maybe it's not as bad and he'll be out there kicking butt again soon.
It begs an interesting philosophical question: would you like to run the race of your life knowing that you would never be able to run again? You would sacrifice everything to blow the field out of the water. Your time and place would be so much better than you ever hoped it would be, but when you finished, you would never be able to start again. Would that be worth it instead of having a lifetime career of running but only making modest personal gains? I don't know for sure, but I do like running just to be outside and to feel like I accomplished something.
I'm finally making some headway on the latest school project. It should be an interesting experiment since we will get to wear some sensors for awhile to test our model. Since we are going to use human test subjects, my advisor blindly checked off some box about it when sending in the research proposal to the school. Now they are making us fill out all this liability stuff and explain our exact test procedure when we aren't really finalized on everything. And, we, the researchers working on the project, are the only ones who are going to be the subjects, so I think we are completely aware of any "dangers" that go along with wearing some sensors.
Lastly, I got home to vote absentee at the city municipal center when I was on fall break. I got that taken care of since I'll be at
SenSys on election day. Really, I don't think either presidential candidate matches my choices. Obama's tax plan raises marginal tax rates for those who make under $45k per year (poor grad student). McCain plans to freeze all research spending for a year after he enters office. Obama hasn't even finished a full term in the Senate; McCain is going to be 80 if he gets elected for two terms.
Both have the wrong idea on the economy. The problem goes beyond government regulation or lack of it. It starts with individuals. A lot of people today are lazy and want everything for nothing. They want the car and house they can't afford, so they go into credit card debt and default on their mortgage. They want the college that puts them $40k in the hole only to graduate and bus tables. They want health care and retirement benefits without lifting a finger. These people purchase what they can't afford and then expect everyone else to pay for it when the repo man comes knocking. It's a sense of entitlement and it drives me mad. Here's a hint to fix this mess: stop buying stuff that you can't afford or shouldn't be, get off your ass, and start contributing to society. The same mindset of the CEOs with enormous golden parachutes and corrupt politicians taking enormous sums from lobbyists is present in everyone. If this persists, we'll be in a barter economy real soon. The problem is that the candidates and government can't blame the constituents without taking heat for it and risking their own jobs and re-election. The solution starts from the bottom up, with you and me, not from the top down (government).